dgMarket®
Tenders and consulting opportunities worldwide
Members: please log in
Alerts Subscription Help
       
 

FP IDIQ ARCHITECT ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR CATHODIC PROTECTION AND CORROSION CONTROL FOR VARIOUS LOCATIONS WORLDWIDE.

Request For Expressions of Interest

General Information

Country:   United States
Notice/Contract Number:   fbo:n6258308r0038
Publication Date:   Oct 15, 2008
Deadline:   Oct 24, 2008
Funding Agency:   Department of the Navy
Buyer:   Naval Facilities Engineering Command
Original Language:   English

Contact Information

Address:    
United States

Assignments

 

Original Text

     view in:

THERE IS NO RFP PACKAGE TO DOWNLOAD. ALL INFORMATION NEEDED TO SUBMIT SF-330 DOCUMENT IS CONTAINED HEREIN. SF 254s AND SF 255s WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED. INDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY ARCHITECTURAL-ENGINEER (A/E) contract for the Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center, Port Hueneme, California. This synopsis is issued as unrestricted and one (1) Firm Fixed Price Contract is anticipated. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for this procurement is 238190, and the annual size standard is $13,000,000.00. This synopsis provides for engineering and design services and studies for cathodic protection and corrosion control at various locations, worldwide. Contract term will be for a Base Year with an option for four (4) additional years. Each performance period will run 365 calendar days from the date of award or exercise of option or until the maximum limit is reached, whichever occurs first. The maximum limit may not exceed $8,000,000.00 per performance period. Multiple Task Orders may be awarded with similar delivery schedules requiring the selected firm to provide services with overlapping work/delivery dates. A minimum of $10,000.00 is guaranteed for the base year only; no other minimum guarantee will be provided for the other years, if exercised. Individual Task Orders are expected to range from $5,000.00 to $8,000,000.00. The work shall be in accordance with this Scope of Work, with the specific Scope of Work incorporated into each Delivery Order, with Project Information which may be included in a DD Form 1391, or an Engineering Service Request (ESR), and with the most current Design Guide for A-E Firms. A. STATEMENT OF SERVICES REQUIRED: The general Scope of Work for this contract is to provide: 1. Engineering services and design for preparation of plans and specifications for construction documents, cost estimates, engineering investigations, studies, inspection, preparation of Operation and Maintenance Manual and associated training at site, and Post Construction Award Services (PCAS), and minor repairs in support of investigations and designs for cathodic protection and corrosion control projects, world wide for DoD. 2. Preparation of Design-Build Requests for Proposals (RFPs) to be used by the Government for obtaining competitive bids for construction contracts, and preparation of Source Selection Criteria. 3. Engineering Site Investigations shall include, but not be limited to, the following: a. Field inspections and written evaluations of existing facilities b. Testing of cathodic protection systems 4. The A-E shall determine and prepare listings of all permits required for each project. The A-E may be required to submit applications, but will not be required to expend funds for fees for securing of permits. 5. Construction Contract Support Services (CCSS) to be provided by the A-E will be negotiated as an option, to be awarded within 540 calendar days of final design of the specific delivery order. 6. The A-E may be required to provide design support of in-house design work being accomplished by the Government. B. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: 1. Engineering Services may be required. 2. Design Quality Control Plans may be required. 3. Project Meetings and Special Presentations may be required. 4. Field Investigations may be required. 5. Field Surveys may be required. 6. Subsurface Investigations may be required. 7. Participation in Value Engineering studies conducted by the Governments VE consultant may be required. 8. The A-Es Resolution of Review Comments will conform to the most current A-E Guide. 9. Basis of Design Reports may be required 10. Specifications will be in SPECSINTACT format. 11. Computer Graphics Design Database may be required. 12. Metric Units of Measurements for design and construction may be required. 13. Designer-to-FEAD (formerly the Resident Officer-In-Charge of Construction (ROICC))/BCE/COE Reports may be required. 14. Designer-to-FEAD/BCE/COE Presentations may be required. 15. Field Verification Prior to Construction (FVPC) may be required. 16. Construction Contract Support Services (CCSS), consisting of submittal reviews and office consultations, may be required. 17. Field Consultation During Construction (FCDC) may be required. 18. Evaluation of Value Engineering Change Proposals (VECP) may be required. 19. Preparation of Record Drawings from as-built marked prints may be negotiated as an option to the Government available for award within 540 calendar days following design completion. 20. Where applicable, Travel Costs, including subsistence, will be negotiated as a fixed price lump sum under each task order. Travel costs associated with construction phase services will be negotiated as an option to the Government. 21. Operations and Maintenance Support Information (OMSI) may be required. 22. Preparation and obtaining all applicable Environmental Permits may be required. 23. Soil/Water Sampling and Reports may be required. 24. Poly-Chloride Biphenyls (PCBs) testing, including material sampling and testing, may be required to locate and quantify PCB containing materials. 25. Site Geochemical Evaluations may be required. 26. Corrosivity Studies, if required, shall provide evaluations of corrosion protection for the surveyed facilities and shall include: a. Visual inspections of exposed areas, and consultation with activity personnel to determine the number, type and location of leaks in the systems. b. Review maintenance records, survey documents and existing system drawings. c. Resistivity measurements at selected locations. The A-E shall develop an equi-resistivity plot for the activity as a reference for future utility installations. d. Structure-to-Soil potential tests. e. Other tests as necessary to provide an evaluation of soil/water corrosivity including excavations to observe conditions of buried structures. f. Investigations of stray current interference on utility lines and other structures in close proximity to systems, and vice versa. g. Provision of adjustments or minor repairs on cathodic protection systems in visible areas, or wherever possible, to achieve better test reading results or to bring systems back into working level conditions. 27. Corrosivity Study Reports, if required shall identify the results of surveys and shall include: a. A set of drawings of surveyed facilities indicating the existing cathodic protection system locations or identifying new required cathodic protection systems, test points/stations, and corrosive areas. b. The results of surveys and appropriate narrative discussions, analyses and conclusions describing the condition of the system and recommended corrosion control measures. c. Sufficient information to enable the activity to generate project documents to correct deficiencies accompanied by appropriate cost estimates, sketches and economic analyses. Recommended corrective actions shall be separated by facility and shall be prioritized as determined by the A-E. The activity Public Works Officer/Engineer, the FEAD or Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) or Air Force Base Civil Engineer (BCE), the Defense Fuel Terminal Staff and the Base Environmental Engineer, Service Petroleum Office Staff, and the NFESC Project Manager (PM) will review submittals and recommendations and will provide comments to the A-E. d. Tabulated test data collected during the survey. e. A Cathodic Protection Inventory Report (CPIR) for use by the activity. The PM or activity will furnish. f. A tabulated listing of existing cathodic protection systems, including, when available, date of installation, equipment sizes and locations, equipment number, anode locations, types and quantities of utilities/facilities protected, etc. List proposed and recommended cathodic protection systems. The format of this work item will be jointly developed by the A-E and NFESC. g. Evaluation of activity corrosion control program, including analysis of present maintenance practices and necessary equipment available to perform periodic testing of systems. Recommended+ improvements in maintenance procedures, including training requirements for activity personnel as well as identification of potential sources of such training, shall also be included. h. Development of corrosion control monitoring systems and maintenance programs for existing underground metallic utility systems and fuel storage tanks, and for aboveground metallic, water and fuel storage tanks. This work item shall include preparation of maintenance schedules which list the items to be checked, approximate location, the frequency of inspection and reporting requirements. i. In cooperation with the NFESC PM and the activity, the A-E will establish a priority list of cathodic protection system deficiencies and problems, based upon investigation data gathered by the A-E, in order to identify the most cost efficient actions and the most critical areas in which to allocate existing and future government resources. The priority listing shall provide sufficient detail information to enable the activity to generate project documentation in support of the recommended actions. The CP system condition assessment shall be tabulated into a spreadsheet. Each item in the priority listing may be required to contain the following information: (1) Correction expense and dollar benefits (including cost to benefit ratio). The A-E shall prepare a life cycle economic analysis in accordance with guidance included in NAVFAC P-442, Economic Analysis Handbook, latest edition. (2) Replacement cost, if the existing cathodic protection system is to be replaced, or the installation cost, if a new cathodic protection system is recommended. (3) The costs of further engineering effort required and the estimated annual overhead and maintenance costs of the system. (4) Risk to environment of safety related accidents as a result of corrosion failure. (5) Impact on activity operational readiness or mission j. Provide preliminary design calculations for metal to be cathodically protected. This information will be used to generate plans and specifications for contract award to correct deficiencies or problems. k. A description of sampling techniques used to obtain information concerning the cathodic protection systems. l. A description of conditions of surveyed facilities (including atmospheric corrosion) in terms of present and potential corrosion problems. m. Coating evaluation of existing protective coatings and recommendations on restoration and replacement. Selection criteria will include (in order of importance): (1) Specialized Experience - Provide a description of similar, recent Cathodic Protection or Cathodic Corrosion Control projects (maximum of ten (10)), with clients, for which team members provided a significant technical contribution. Work on these projects must have been done in the last five (5) years. In matrix form, identify which team members worked on the projects described above. (2) Professional Qualifications - Submit a matrix for proposed design team(s), including alternates that contains the following data about the members assignment: team members name, firm name, level and area of concentration (i.e., BS electrical engineering), location of professional registration including license number, states of professional registration, number of year professional experience, and number of years with current firm. Identify any API, AWS, NACE, ASNT, etc. certification of all team members. Identify any prior/active security clearances of all team members. For project managers and team leaders, identify the number of teams (design, consultants, and joint venture partners) they have managed over the past five years. (3) Capacity - The ability of the firm to execute multiple, simultaneous projects within a reasonable minimum time limit as demonstrated by the teams history of successfully completing projects in compliance with performance schedules and providing timely construction support. Discuss how surge workload would be handled. (4) Past Performance of the firm during contracts with Government agencies and/or private industry with respect to cost control, quality of work, and compliance with performance schedules. Demonstrated long-term Government or private business relationships, repeat business on related efforts and construction support are valued. Provide a listing of all excellent performance ratings and letters of commendation from both private and DoD clients (designate your role; prime, consultant, or joint venture partner). Ratings should be not later than five (5) years. Provide an explanation of your management approach, an organizational chart showing inter-relationship of management and design team components, and specific quality control process. Describe your quality control program/process; identify who has the responsibility for implementation of the program, and discuss how you instill a culture of quality throughout the team. (5) Small Business and Small Disadvantaged Business Subcontracting Plan. Firms will be evaluated on the extent to which they identify and commit to the published Small Business Subcontracting Program. The Secretary of the Navy has assigned the Naval Facilities Engineering Command goals expressed in terms of percentages of total planned subcontracting dollars for utilization of small business of 76.07%. Included in the SB goals are targets for: Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB) 15.88%, Women Owned Small Business (WOSB) 14.22%, Veteran Owned Small Business (VOSB) 3%, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) 3%, and HUBZone Small Business 3.1%. Large business firms shall submit their Navy wide SF 295, Summary Subcontract Report with their SF 330. The slated firms will be required to provide a preliminary subcontracting plan (support for small business subcontracting) as part of the interview. Note: If large business is selected for award, an acceptable subcontracting plan that reflects a minimum of subcontracting goals stated above must be submitted before price negotiations begin for contract award. (6) Location - Firms location within and demonstrated knowledge of the general geographical areas in which projects could be located. Indicate firms location of main offices, branch offices, and sub-consultants offices. Describe and illustrate the teams knowledge and availability to work in the geographical area. (7) Volume of Work previously awarded to the firm by the Department of Defense within the past twelve months. Indicate in Block H the total dollar value of contracts awarded and their projected completion schedules. SF 330s shall not exceed 50 printed pages (double sided is considered to be two pages, organizational charts and photographs excluded. Exception: photographs with text will be considered as a page). All information must be included on the SF 330 (cover letter, other attachments and pages in excess of the 50 page limit will not be included in the evaluation process). Firms, their subsidiaries, or affiliates, which design or prepare specifications for a construction contract or procurement or supplies, cannot provide the construction or supplies. This limitation also applies to subsidiaries and affiliates of the firm. SF 330 Part I is limited to 50 pages. SF 330, Part II is limited to one page for the prime contractor and one page for each subcontractor. In Part I, Section B, block 5, include the firms Tax Identification Number and ACASS number. Part II, block 5(b), Small Business Status do not leave this blank. An original and three copies of the submittal package is to be received in this office no later than 2:00 p.m., Pacific Time on August 04, 2008. Submittals received after this date and time will not be considered. Telegraphic and facsimile of SF 330s will not be accepted. Site visits will not be arranged during the submittal period. In accordance with DFAS 252.204-7004, all firms must be registered with the Central Contractor Registration (CCR) prior to award of any contract. Responses are to be submitted to NFELC, Specialty Center Contracts Core, Code RAQN0, Naval Base Ventura County, 1205 Mill 7Road, Bldg. 850, Port Hueneme, CA 93043-4347, Attn: Ms. Soledad P. Credo. Outside corner of mailing envelope shall be labeled as follows: A/E Services, N62583-08-R-0038.
Set-aside code: N/A
Contact: Soledad Credo 805-982-2840

Link To Document

Updated on 2008/08/04

This requirement originally synopsized on 27 June 2008 is amended to extend theresponse date from 04 August 2008 to 25 August 2008. All other informationremains the same.
Set-aside code: N/A
Contact: Soledad Credo 805-982-2840

Link To Document

Updated on 2008/08/21

This requirement originally synopsized on 27 June 2008 is amended to extend the response date from 25 August 2008 to 05 September 2008. All other information remains the same.
Set-aside code: N/A
Contact: SOLEDAD CREDO 805-982-2840

Link To Document

Updated on 2008/09/04

This requirement originally synopsized on 27 June 2008 is amended to extend the response date from 05 September 2008 to 26 September 2008. All other information remains the same.
Set-aside code: N/A
Contact: SOLEDAD CREDO 805-982-2840

Link To Document

Updated on 2008/09/11

This requirement originally synopsized on 27 June 2008 is amended to incorporate minor repairs into the Scope of Work. The Government may, at its option, have the repairs done under this contract or by other means. All repairs of deficiencies found during inspections shall be identified to the Contracting Officer. If the repairs are deemed necessary and the Government elects to have the repairs performed under this contract, it shall be an option to the task order and shall only be exercised by direction of the Contracting Officer via issuance of a modification. If known repairs are necessary and the Government elects to have the repairs performed under this contract, a task order will be issued. The following are requirements that shall be followed unless directed otherwise. The latest editions of all applicable codes shall be used: (1) All work shall be performed in a professional, safe, and environmentally responsible manner in accordance to applicable federal! , state and local regulations; (2) Inspections and repairs shall be carried out in accordance to NACE, International Standard and Recommended Practices. The contractor is also required to follow recommended practices, maintenance and operation, design and installation recommendations as outlined in the Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC 3-570) which has been formally been adopted by the Tri-Services; and (3) Work shall be performed in compliance with applicable federal, state and local codes and regulations. This includes adherence to all military service regulations concerning safety, work quality and security. All other terms and conditions remain the same.
Set-aside code: N/A
Contact: SOLEDAD CREDO 805-982-2840

Link To Document

Updated on 2008/10/10

This amendment is issued to incorporate corrections to the original synopsis issued on 27 June 2008 and all modifications issued thereafter. In order to incorporate the corrections below the response date for Request for Proposals (RFPs) is hereby extended to 24 October 2008 before 4:00pm PST. 1)THE CONTRACT SPECIALIST IS HEREBY CHANGED TO: ELEANOR J. DRAKE, 805-982-3953, Eleanor.drake@navy.mil. 2)THE NACIS CODE IS HEREBY CHANGED TO 541330. 3)THE INDUSTRY SIZE STANDARD IS CHANGED TO $6,500,000 TO CORRESPOND TO THE NACIS CODE. 4)EACH PERFORMANCE PERIOD WILL RUN FOR 365 CALANDAR DAYS FROM THE DATE OF AWARD OR EXERCISED OPTION. 5)THE TOTAL MAXIUM DOLLAR VALUE OF THIS FIRM FIXED PRICED IDIQ CONTRACT IS $40,000,000 FOR THE LIVE OF THE CONTRACT. 6)ANY LARGE BUSINESS THAT RESPONDS MUST ADHERE TO THE NEW SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING GOALS OF:a.SMALL BUSINESS (SM), 77.51%b.SMALL DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS (SDB), 16.18%c.WOMAN OWNED BUSINESS (WOSB), 14.53%d.SERVICE DISABLED VETERAN OWNED BUSINESS (SDVOSB), 3%e.HUBZONE SMALL BUSINESS, 3% 7)ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE ORIGINAL SYNOPSIS AND ITS MODIFICATIONS ARE HEREBY INCORPORATED.
Set-aside code: N/A
Contact: ELEANOR J. DRAKE 805-982-3953 ELEANOR J. DRAKE

Link To Document

Updated on 2008/10/14

THIS MODIFICATION IS TO CLARIFY THE RESPONSE DATE. THE RESPONSE DATE AND TIME IS 24 OCTOBER 2008 BEFORE 4:00PM PST. PROPOSAL SHOULD STATE ATTN: ELEANOR DRAKE VERSES SOLEDAD CREDO.
Set-aside code: N/A
Contact: ELEANOR DRAKE 805-982-3953

Link To Document
Please note that this notice is for your information only.
We try our best to have the most accurate and up-to-date information available on our web site, but we cannot guarantee that all of the information provided is error-free.
If you have any suggestions for updates/corrections for this notice, please let us know.








Bahasa Indonesia  Català  Deutsch  Eesti  English  Español  Français  Italiano  Polski  Português  Română  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Uzbek  Ελληνικά  Монгол  Русский  Հայերեն  اردو  عربي  ქართული  中文  日本語 
Partners Privacy Policy Procurement Regulations Terms and Conditions RSS Contact Us

dgMarket -  Tenders and consulting opportunities worldwide